Facing Wisconsin Drunk-driving Charges?  

Look Into Real Success Stories

Dealing with WI OWI charges is nothing short of terrifying. You may feel like there’s nothing you can do, but the reality is that using a Wisconsin DUI lawyer who has multiple success stories to share can give you the hope and the defense you need against a DUI. Wisconsin is not a friendly place when it comes to drunk-driving, so choosing an attorney with experience in the field makes all the difference.

Remember, every case is different, so a long history of success is not a guarantee that your attorney will win your case.  The Law Offices of Andrew Mishlove, however, are proud of the many examples that have made them one of the best DUI OWI law firms in America.

Recent Wisconsin Drunk-driving Defense Success Stories

• State of Wisconsin v. Dal (last name withheld): 2011, Criminal reckless driving causing bodily harm. Dal was facing a criminal conviction and jail sentence for allegedly grabbing and jerking the steering wheel of a car in which she was a passenger, causing a serious accident.  We fought the case on many grounds.  Unltimately the charge was reduced to a non-criminal ticket.  Dal avoided a criminal reocrd and a jail sentence.
• State of Wisconsin v. Paul (last name withheld): 2011, 3rd offense charge, Waupaca County.  Paul was facing a criminal conviction, a long jail sentence a long revocation.  We fought the case, challenging the legitimacy of an alleged prior conviction.  The charge was reduced to a non-criminal first offense DUI.  Paul avoided a criminal conviction and a jail sentence.  the revocation was reduced.
• State of Wisconsin v. Douglas (last name withheld): 2011, 2d offense charge.  This case was dismissed becuase the prosecution failed to preserve critical evidence.  Douglas avoided a criminal conviction, revocation and jail sentence.
• State of Wisconsin v. Mark (last name withheld): 2011.  Criminal OWI with a minor in the vehicle.  This case was reduced to a non-criminal charge.  Mark avoided a long jail sentence.
• State of Wisconsin v. Sara (last name withheld): 2011, Door County 3rd offense.  Sara was facing a driver's lice revocation and a long jail sentence.  We fought the case, arguing that the police officer did not have a legal basis to pull Sara over.  The case was dismissed.
• State of Wisconsin v. Jeffrey (last name withheld) 2011, Marathon County 5th offense.  In this felony case, Jeffrey was facing a prison sentence that would deprive him of his freedom and career.  We challenged the legitimacy of one of the prior convictions, on the grounds that Jeffrey was denied his right to an atotrney in the prior case.  The charge was reduced to a 4th offense miscdemeanor and Jeffrey avoided prison.
• Bayside v. Im (last name withheld): 2011, This case was fought on the basis of probelms with the chemical test.  The charge was reduced to a non-DUI offense.  The client's license was saved.
• Kenosha County v. Keith (last name withheld):  2011,  This case was fought all the way to a jury trial in the circuit court.  Attorney Stuckert obtained a verdict of Not Guilty.
• Pleasant Prairie v. Kelley (last name withheld): 2011, Kelley was an Illinois driver facing a lifetime revoczation of his license if he was convicted.   There were several serious probelems with the manner in which the breath test was adminnistered, creating a possibility of radio frequency inteference and mouth alcohol contamination.  The charge was reduced to a non-DUI offense.  Kelley's license was saved.
• State of Wisconsin v. Pavittar (last name withheld): 2011, Milwaukee County, 4th offense.  This gentleman was found quite drunk seated in the driver's seat of his car.  A citizen witness had reported that the car was driving erratically.  A police lieutenant stated that he saw Pav driving the car. Police dispatch records, however, indicated that the lieutenant arrived at the scene five minutes after the car was parked.  Other witnesses reported a different driver.  Attorney Mishlove tried the case to a jury and Pav was found Not Guilty.  We saved him from a long jail sentence and irreparable damage to his family. 
• Wauwatosa v. Ajay (last name withheld): 2011, Milwaukee County, 1st offense.  In this case, a citizen witness called the police to report that the AJ was driving erratically.  The police located AJ in his garage.  We argued that the police entered the private garage unlawfully, without a warrant.  The case was reduced to a non-drunk driving charge.
• Pleasant Prairie v. Kelly (last name withheld): April 2011, Kenosha County, April 2011.  Kelly was an Illinois driver facing a lifetime Illinois license revocation (as Illinois drivers are treated unfairly by that state).  The police accused him of weaving, failing field tests and having a breath test result of .12.  The police surveillance video, however, showed him appearing normal.  More importantly, the video showed that he had gum in his mouth just prior to the breath test and that he was talking on a cell phone was the breath machine was operating.  The case was reduced to a non-drunk driving charge.
• Oak Creek v. Gregory (last nam withheld): 2011, Milwaukee County, 1st offense.  March, 2011. Greg was found by the police in his car, which he had driven into a ditch.  According to the police he failed field sobriety tests and had a breath test result over the legal limit.  We went to a court trial in the municipal court and lost.  Attorney Mishlove objected, however, because the trial was at night and the court building was locked.  On appeal, the court held that Greg was denied his right to a trial that was public.  The case was dismissed.
• State of Wisconsin v. Keith (last name withheld): 2011, Kenosha County, 1st offense, CDL holder.  Keith was a truckdriver whose career was at stake in this case.  According to the police, he was weaving on the highway, failed his field sobriety tests and had a .12 breath test result.  We tried the case to a jury and Keith was found Not Guilty.  His career was saved.
• State of Wisconsin v. Dale (last name withheld): 2011, Vilas County, 3rd offense OWI charge.:   Dale drives for a living, as a salesman.   A conviction in this case would have resulted in a loss of his career.  We set the matter for a jury trial and appeared in court ready to proceed. On the morning of trial the case was reduced to a non-drunk driving charge.  Dale's driver's license and career were saved.
• State of Wisconsin v. Daniel (last name withheld): 2011, Court of Appeals, District II:  This case from Racine County is also mentioned below.  The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court.  Case dismissed.
• State of Wisconsin v. William (last name withheld): 2011, Brown County. 2d offense OWI charge.  William was facing a lifetime revocation of his Illinois license and a jail sentence.  The state, however, lost critical video evidence.  The case was dismissed.
• State of Wisconsin v. Patricia (last name withheld): 2010, Washington County.  3rd offense OWI charge. Pat lost control of her car and ran into a ditch because she adjusting her radio.  A citizen reported that she was intoxicated.  The deputy reported that she had an odor of intoxicants and that she failed field sobriety tests.  A preliminary breath test and a blood test were over the limit.  We tried the case to a jury, and Pat was found Not Guilty.
• State of Wisconsin v. Alfredo (last name withheld): 2010, Milwaukee County.  3rd offense OWI charge.  Alfredo was facing a long jail sentence and driver's license revocation.  He was found asleep behind the wheel of his running car, and charged with OWI, even though someone else was the driver. We tried the case to a jury and Alfredo was found Not Guilty.
• Town of Brookfield v. Thomas (last name withheld): 2010: Waukesha County.   Thomas was an Illinois driver facing a one-year to life Illinois license revocation if he was convicted of this offense.  The police testified that he was driving recklessly, almost caused an accident, appeared drunk and failed field sobriety tests.  Because he did not consent to a breath test, there was no test result.  The video recording of the incident was not consistent with the police testimony.  We tried the case to a jury, and Thomas was found Not Guilty.
• State of Wisconsin v. Jason (last name withheld): October 2010.  Winnebago County, Wisconsin 4th Offense OWI Charge:  Jason used to truck to shove and disable the car of a dangerously drunk driver.  Jason and the other driver were both charged with an OWI.  We argued that his actions were justified in order to prevent a real danger of serious injury to other people.  We tried the case to a jury, and Jason was found Not Guilty.
• County of Milwaukee v. James (last name withheld):  2010:  This gentleman was an Illinois driver, facing a lifetime revocation of his Illinois driver's license if he was convicted in Wisconsin.  It was a hard-fought case.  When it finally came to trial, the prosecution could not proceed.  The case was dismissed.
• Butler v. Levarn (last Name withheld):   2010: This case was hard-fought and actually went to trial several times.  At one point a conviction was reversed by the court of appeals. At the final trial, the prosecution failed to prove that the blood was properly drawn from the defendant and transported to the laboratory.  The charge was reduced to a non-DUI charge.
• Oak Creek v. Christopher (last name withheld):  Christopher was a gentleman from out-of-state with a good job that required extensive traveling.  An alcohol-related driving conviction would have ruined his career. Christopher was reported to the police by a citizen witness.  The witness reported that he was an intoxicated driver in the drive-through of a fast-food restaurant.  He was located and arrested by the police in the parking lot of the restaurant.  The citizen witness proved to be an unreliable witness.  The charge was reduced to a non- DUI charge, with no driver's license revocation.  Christopher's career was saved.
• State of Wisconsin v. Bruce (last name withheld):  2010.  Walworth County, Wisconsin. While being represented by a different lawyer, Bruce pled guilty to a felony fifth offense drunk-driving in 2004.  He served 21 months in prison and was on parole (now called extended supervision).  When he was arrested again in 2009, he called Attorney Mishlove.  Because of the recent arrest, Bruce, was ordered to serve another 15 months in prison on the old, 2004, felony charge.  Attorney Mishlove successfully argued that the 2004 case should really have been a fourth rather than a fifth offense, so he had already done more than the maximum sentence.   Bruce's charge was reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor and he was immediately released from prison.
• State of Wisconsin v. Paul (last name withheld): 2010.  Winnebago County third offense charge.    Paul was a 45 year old truck driver facing a third offense drunk-driving charge.  His career was on the line (not to mention a long jail sentence).  Paul was found passed out behind the wheel of his running vehicle at a truck stop.   Attorney Mishlove tried the case to a jury and Paul was found Not Guilty.
• State of Wisconsin v. Gene (last name withheld):   2010, Walworth County third offense charge.  Gene was charged in Walworth County, Wisconsin with third offense drunken driving.  We were convinced that it should have been charged as a first offense.  The judge, however, didn't see it that way and Gene was facing up to one year in jail.  We were very confident that we could win an appeal; but, it turned out that an appeal was unnecessary.  We tried the case to a jury, and Gene was found Not Guilty.
• City of South Milwaukee v. Justin (last name withheld): 2010.  Justin was arrested by the City of South Milwaukee police.  He declined to give a breath sample and was also charged with refusal to submit to the test.   We successfully argued that Justin was never properly advised of his rights regarding the chemical test, so he did not legally refuse the test.  Both the refusal and the drunken driving were dismissed.
• State of Wisconsin v. Daniel (last name withheld):   2010, Racine County circuit court, third offense OWI charge.  Daniel was arrested in 2006 for this case.  The matter was delayed time after time, so that the state could provide an undamaged copy of the arrest video.  Eventually the judge dismissed the case, but the court of appeals reinstated the matter. Recently, there was a series of hearings and arguments about why the video was not properly produced.  Surprisingly, it was discovered that the state had an undamaged copy all along.   Case dismissed.
• State of Wisconsin v. Scott (last name withheld):  2010.  Scott was arrested after crashing his car into a neighbor’s garage, after leaving the neighbor's house.  Unfortunately, Scott was impaired by alcohol, and was charged with drunken driving.  The charge was dismissed because we successfully argued that he never actually operated the car on a public roadway.
• State of Wisconsin v. Sean (last name withheld):  2010.  Last year, Sean hired an inexperienced lawyer, pled guilty to third offense OWI and was sentenced to jail.  He did have two prior OWI convictions.  We looked at the prior convictions and quickly realized that neither one of them should have been counted.  In a recent hearing, Sean's case was reduced from a third offense to a first offense.
• City of Waukesha v. Patrick (last name withheld):  2010, OWI and Refusal.  Not Guilty finding on both counts after trial.
• City of Milwaukee v. Chad (last name withheld):  2010,  OWI, Hit and Run and Refusal. All charges dismissed on defendant's motion at trial.
• Village of Jackson v. George (last name withheld), 2010 George is a 46-year-old truck driver who had never been in trouble before in his life. But this charge would have cost him his career. We were able to get the charge reduced to reckless driving. George is still a truck driver.
• Kenosha County v. David (last name withheld). 2010 David was an Illinois driver facing a lifetime Illinois driver’s license revocation. The prosecutor refused to negotiate, so we went to trial. They were unable to properly present their evidence, so they had to reduce the charge to reckless driving.

For A Wisconsin DUI Lawyer, Happy Clients Mean Everything

Case results are important, but so do the comments of those who are facing a charge like a DUI. Wisconsin residents have found again and again that Andrew Mishlove is ready to tackle the toughest Wisconsin drunk-driving cases. The following are examples of case examples and client reviews our law firm that have been posted by our clients on www.AVVO.com, the independent lawyer-rating internet site.

Every Wisconsin drunk-driving case is different and past success is no guarantee for the future. Here are examples, however, of why the Law Offices of Andrew Mishlove is considered the finest Wisconsin DUI lawyer in Wisconsin and one of the best in America.

Never Think Your Situation is Hopeless - Hire a Specialist
Posted by: anonymous,  
Client Review: I hired attorney Mishlove to fight a DUI involving a blood test. i fought the charges at a 12 man jury , Attorney Mishlove not only is an excellent trial attorney. He also knows blood alcohol science. His knowledge in this field won me a not guilty verdict. All 12 jurors were convinced of my innocence. In something as serious as DUI , hire the best.
Lawyer Comment: This blood test case resulted in a not guilty verdict, due to possible contamination of the blood sample.

SOMETIMES YOU JUST DON’T KNOW HOW LUCKY YOU CAN BE!
Posted by: Cynthia,  
Client Review: Taking into consideration the embarrassing nature of being charged with a DUI and then not being able to focus on the importance of selecting an attorney to represent you...........What an uncomfortable situation! I was referred to Atty Mishlove by a friend who is an attorney in another state. His words were "why not go with the best?" "you deserve the best representation possible."
Lawyer's Comment: Cynthia's case was dismissed.

Reduced My First Offense
Posted by: anonymous,.
Client Review: I'm an Illinois resident that got pulled over just before the border in Wisconsin. Andrew did an excellent job getting my charge reduced (which isn't easy in Wisconsin) and preventing me from having to go through the nightmare of dealing with the elevated penalties Illinois applies to its drivers when they receive a DUI in Wisconsin. Would highly recommend.
Lawyer's Comment: This case was reduced to a non-DUI charge.

My Perfect Lawyer
Posted by: Mitch, 
Client Review: Andrew Mishlove could be the best DWI lawyer in Wisconsin. I was pushed to make a deal in my pending situation. I told my lawyer that the deal was unacceptable. He told me that he went to a seminar that was hosted by Andrew, and that his expertise would be needed to defend my case. I used both lawyers together and it was the best decision I could have made in this situation. Andrew was incredible, to say the least! His expertise was crucial to getting my case dismissed. His knowledge of DWI Law is a step above any attorney that your friend, co-worker, or relative may refer you. I can not express in words how much Andrew has helped me & family through. Thank you, Andrew!
Lawyer's Comment: Mitch's case was dismissed when it was discovered that the police had covered up the loss of evidence in this mistaken case of Wisconsin drunk-driving.

Who's in Your Corner, Fighting for You?
Posted by: Ed, 
Client Review: Thank You, Andrew and Sarah !!!! I really appreciate your genuine interest in my well being, as well as interpreting the facts related to the stop, and defending me in my DUI case. I have really taken a hard look at my past drinking patterns, and will continue working to assure I will never make this mistake again.
Lawyer's Comment: Ed's case was dismissed.

Mr. Mishlove is a great attorney
Posted by: Andrea,  
Client Review: He was able to inform us of how the law works and informed us "do not plea guilty to the DUI charge." He was able to have charge dismissed and get us a misdemeanor, which helped my husband keep his license and save us from having to pay costly insurance payments down the road.
Lawyer Comment: Andrea’s Wisconsin OWI case was dismissed.

From felony to a misdemeanor
Posted by: Steven, 
Client Review: Because of the knowledge and expertise of Mr. Mishlove, my felony 5th D.U.I. was reduced to a misdemeanor 4th. In addition, he argued for the minimum sentence for a 4th offense and we won. I had a few factors working to my benefit in the case, but without Mr. Mishlove the outcome would not have been possible. I would highly recommend his service for a D.U.I./ O.W.I. case.

Got the job done
Posted by: Trish,
Client Review: Andrew and his firm we compassionate, respectful and most of all effective. They were able to take my case and point out all of the unjust and invalid evidence. Gaining me a Dismissed verdict. Well Done!!!

OWI Mishaps
Posted by: Terry, 
Client Review: Mishlove law office staff very understanding about my problem and kept me informed every step of the way during the process. Andrew gave great advice and very understanding to my needs. If you have an OWI or any traffic offence you would want Andrew Mishlove fighting in you corner.
Lawyer's Comment: Terry's WI OWI case was dismissed.

Adam (last name with-held on this website)
Posted by: anonymous, 
Client Review: Great lawyer, I am still in the middle of my case but it is looking very optimistic. He did a great job of looking at every detail and finding the best way to fight my case.
Lawyer's Comment: Adam's case was dismissed on December 28, 2009, after the court had ruled that he was illegally stopped by the police.

Endorsment from client: Mark (last name withheld on this website) Antioch (IL)
Client Review: After working with Andrew, I have to say that he is one of the most competent people I have ever met. His attention to every detail and skill in the courtroom is unsurpassed. As a former client of his, I have nothing but praise and if you are in need of representation, you can do no better.
Lawyer's Comment: Mark's Wisconsin drunk-driving charge was reduced to reckless driving.

He works for you
Client Review: Andrew Mishlove's swagger was the first thing I noticed about him. He is a very confident man, and with his knowledge of laws and rights he has defending down to a science. I would recommend this attorney to anyone seeking DWI defense in the entire state of Wisconsin and I appreciate his efforts for me and my family more than I ever could of dreamed. Andrew Mishlove is not just an attorney, but a friend because he takes all cases as if it were his own flesh and blood he is defending.
Lawyer Comment: This case was won because the WI OWI prosecution was unable to show that the blood was correctly drawn by a qualified person.

Shawano DUI
Posted by: griemer, 
Client Review: Attorney Mishlove handled my case extremely well. Shawano County has a definite reputation as not being "pro defendant", especially in DUI cases. Most lawyers will not even consider taking cases in this county and if they do, they feel they have lost before the case even starts. Plea bargains are virtually non-existent. Attorney Mishlove was able to win my case when against very high odds. Attorney Mishlove's knowledge of DUI laws was evident throughout the whole process. His extensive knowledge of sobriety tests, test guidelines, laws, and administration of the tests was clearly demonstrated, and quite crucial in my case. His courtroom presence, delivery, and cross examination was incredible, and resulted in me winning my case. Attorney Mishlove's staff is A1 and always provided me with assistance and guidance, and put me in touch with Attorney Mishlove whenever I requested.
Lawyer Comment: This was a blood test case, where we believed that the field sobriety tests and the blood test were improperly done.  The prosecution would not budge, so we went to a jury trial.  The verdict was NOT GUILTY on all counts.

Minor DUI
Posted by: anonymous,  
Client Review: Extremely knowledgeable on Case law and immediately responsive to questions via email and or phone. I am also an attorney in another state and have never dealt with any attorney of his stature. He does not offer false hope nor is he negative. Andrew is extremely matter of fact and the go to guy for DUI law defense in Wisconsin.
Lawyer's Comment:  A successful appeal in this case established that entrapment is a proper defense in a Wisconsin OWI case.

Get expert legal help from one of the most respected DUI/OWI defense lawyer options in Wisconsin.